Total Conservation Programs in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 63
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $1,295,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bitterwater Land & Cattle | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $78,886 |
2 | Miller Moth LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $61,323 |
3 | Robert K Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $50,000 |
4 | Clark Brothers | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $47,810 |
5 | Michael Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $46,540 |
6 | Junis Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $45,811 |
7 | Lonnie Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $45,811 |
8 | Cheryl Skelton Seperate Property Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $44,762 |
9 | Darrell Skelton Seperate Property Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $44,762 |
10 | Joseph D Kuhnle | Shandon, CA 93461 | $44,482 |
11 | L Y 7 Company | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $42,309 |
12 | Kuhnle Properties Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $38,878 |
13 | Mitch Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $37,954 |
14 | Kelly Miller Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $37,942 |
15 | Stacy Miller Bonnifield | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $37,942 |
16 | Ernst Family Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $35,501 |
17 | C R Grant Ranch LLC | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $34,466 |
18 | Carly Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $30,663 |
19 | Garrett Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $30,663 |
20 | Robert A Grant Jr Trust Dated Nov 5 2004 | Shandon, CA 93461 | $30,576 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>