Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Barbara County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 309
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $32,029,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Red Blossom Sales Inc | Salinas, CA 93901 | $500,000 |
22 | Fresh Bounty Of Santa Maria Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $497,853 |
23 | H & R Souza Inc | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $495,000 |
24 | Big J Produce Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $439,661 |
25 | L & G Farming Co., Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $428,854 |
26 | Hill Top Produce Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $427,482 |
27 | Cuyama Dairy Farm | Maricopa, CA 93252 | $416,579 |
28 | Brothers Best Farming Inc | Arroyo Grande, CA 93421 | $396,912 |
29 | Agpro, Inc. | Santa Barbara, CA 93111 | $326,244 |
30 | Hernandez Farming Co. Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $310,452 |
31 | Socal Berry Growers LLC | Ventura, CA 93003 | $300,000 |
32 | Suncoast Nursery LLC | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $268,144 |
33 | Golden Valley Berries Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $254,532 |
34 | Contreras Farming Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $250,000 |
35 | B & M Farms, Inc. | Guadalupe, CA 93434 | $250,000 |
36 | Big E Produce Inc | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $250,000 |
37 | Lc Farm Service Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $250,000 |
38 | Mesa View Produce Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $250,000 |
39 | Monte J Farming Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $250,000 |
40 | Oscar Sanchez Dba Ixtapa Farms | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $250,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”