Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Barbara County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 97
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $4,824,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Acquistapace Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $500,000 |
| 2 | Suncoast Nursery LLC | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $268,144 |
| 3 | Big E Produce Inc | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $250,000 |
| 4 | Myriad Flowers International, Inc. | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $250,000 |
| 5 | H & R Souza Inc | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $245,000 |
| 6 | Freitas Brothers Farms LLC | Guadalupe, CA 93434 | $244,115 |
| 7 | Kg Berry Farms LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $199,609 |
| 8 | Rancho Laguna Farms LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $193,773 |
| 9 | Area 51 Vineyards LLC | Buellton, CA 93427 | $130,357 |
| 10 | Strawberry Services Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $116,732 |
| 11 | Brassica Wholesale Nursery Inc | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $116,420 |
| 12 | Buenaventura Ranch LLC | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $101,500 |
| 13 | Riverbench LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $99,549 |
| 14 | Los Hermanos Harvesting Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $99,381 |
| 15 | Coastal Vineyard Care Associates | Buellton, CA 93427 | $97,694 |
| 16 | Portico Hills Vineyard LLC | Placentia, CA 92870 | $87,782 |
| 17 | A Casas Farms Inc | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $84,367 |
| 18 | G.c. Farming Inc. | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $78,854 |
| 19 | Rancho Canada De Los Pinos, LLC | Placentia, CA 92870 | $78,613 |
| 20 | Carpinteria Fruit Company LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | $71,680 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf