Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Barbara County, California, 2020

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 222

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $25,684,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2020
1Byrd Farming Partners, LLCGuadalupe, CA 93434$750,000
2Edward Silva & Sons IncSanta Maria, CA 93458$679,044
3Satellite Farms LLCSanta Maria, CA 93454$575,000
4Ocean Breeze InternationalCarpinteria, CA 93013$516,890
5De Bernardi BrosSanta Maria, CA 93454$500,000
6Agro-jal Farming Enterprises IncSanta Maria, CA 93458$500,000
7Cardenas Bros Farming IncSanta Maria, CA 93455$500,000
8Dl Farm Management IncSanta Maria, CA 93454$500,000
9Mar Vista Berry II LLCSanta Maria, CA 93455$500,000
10Savino Farms IncSanta Maria, CA 93455$500,000
11Gold Coast Farms IncSanta Maria, CA 93456$500,000
12Rancho Guadalupe LLCSanta Maria, CA 93458$500,000
13Red Blossom Sales IncSalinas, CA 93901$500,000
14Blackjack Farms De La Costa CentrSanta Maria, CA 93455$495,000
15Babe Farms IncSanta Maria, CA 93456$490,000
16Jed LLC Dba-river Edge FarmsSanta Maria, CA 93458$475,000
17Fresh Bounty Of Santa Maria IncSanta Maria, CA 93456$465,525
18La Palma Farms IncSanta Maria, CA 93455$459,910
19New Hope Harvesting LLCSanta Maria, CA 93454$457,668
20Destiny Farms LLCSanta Maria, CA 93456$450,000

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag