Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Barbara County, California, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 97

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $4,824,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2021
21Arc Vineyard LLCSanta Maria, CA 93455$61,439
22Juanita Aguilar Hernandez Dba- Garcia FarmingSanta Maria, CA 93454$59,738
23Paulino Lopez MartinezSanta Maria, CA 93455$54,667
24Filemon Jarquin Dba Jarquin FarmsSanta Maria, CA 93458$54,134
25Paramount Panels, Inc. Dba Rio Vista VineyardOntario, CA 91761$50,772
26Karam Pistachio Farm IncNewport Beach, CA 92658$50,055
27Broccoli Queen, LLCSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401$49,259
28Mauracher Ranch CorpCarpinteria, CA 93013$47,751
29Ferniza Farms IncSanta Maria, CA 93456$47,435
30Ricardo RojasSanta Maria, CA 93458$46,996
31Stow Land Company LLCGoleta, CA 93116$44,753
32Inelba Romero-dba Milpa FarmingSanta Maria, CA 93456$44,246
33La Patera Cattle CompanyGoleta, CA 93116$41,060
34Calhaven LLCSanta Barbara, CA 93108$40,582
35Santa Barbara Orchid Estate IncSanta Barbara, CA 93111$40,489
36Kessler Haak Vineyards LLCLompoc, CA 93436$39,619
37Egt Worldwide 1 LLCMission Viejo, CA 92692$38,610
38Maverick Farming Company LLCSanta Maria, CA 93455$34,832
39Gallup & Stribling Orchids LLCCarpinteria, CA 93013$29,450
40Pedro Venegas AguilarSanta Maria, CA 93458$27,358

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag