Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Barbara County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 97
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $4,824,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Harrington Farms | Maricopa, CA 93252 | $26,455 |
42 | Em Jag C Corporation | Goleta, CA 93117 | $25,783 |
43 | Foothill Farms Of Cuyama LLC | New Cuyama, CA 93254 | $25,285 |
44 | Stow Company LLC | Goleta, CA 93116 | $24,372 |
45 | Rancho La Vina | Buellton, CA 93427 | $24,355 |
46 | Fowler 1999 Family Trust | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $24,016 |
47 | Mary Louise Sanchez | Carpinteria, CA 93014 | $23,971 |
48 | Brown Investments Inc | Carpinteria, CA 93014 | $23,971 |
49 | Camcsm Inc-dba California Coast Naturals | Goleta, CA 93117 | $21,024 |
50 | Santos Barrera-dba Holy Farming | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $20,343 |
51 | Sheron, LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $19,882 |
52 | Blueberries Ole LLC | Orcutt, CA 93455 | $19,529 |
53 | Kraus/gibson Revocable Trust Of 1987 | Nashville, TN 37220 | $18,224 |
54 | Monte Alban Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $17,856 |
55 | Memorio Hernandez Gomez | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $17,753 |
56 | Little Pete's Farm Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $16,024 |
57 | Luis Perez | Guadalupe, CA 93434 | $15,145 |
58 | All About Ag, Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $14,800 |
59 | Cottonwood Canyon Vineyard | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $14,150 |
60 | Mary H Ota- Ota Family Trust | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $14,128 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”