Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Barbara County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 309
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $32,029,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Guillen Berry Farms, LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $221,263 |
62 | Kg Berry Farms LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $199,609 |
63 | La Patera Cattle Company | Goleta, CA 93116 | $198,529 |
64 | Rancho Laguna Farms LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $193,773 |
65 | Valle El Paraiso Berry Farms, LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $189,062 |
66 | Stow Company LLC | Goleta, CA 93116 | $180,867 |
67 | Profresco Inc. | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $177,146 |
68 | Gallup & Stribling Orchids LLC | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $150,979 |
69 | Donato Olivera Gomez Dba-donato O | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $147,632 |
70 | Giorgi Ranches Inc | Goleta, CA 93117 | $146,256 |
71 | Brassica Farms | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $138,600 |
72 | Area 51 Vineyards LLC | Buellton, CA 93427 | $130,357 |
73 | La Mina Harvesting Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $130,226 |
74 | Ferniza Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $119,107 |
75 | Strawberry Services Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $116,732 |
76 | Brassica Wholesale Nursery Inc | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $116,420 |
77 | Faustino Gomez-bba Faustino Gomez | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $113,874 |
78 | The Cultured Abalone Farm, LLC | Goleta, CA 93117 | $108,005 |
79 | Joseph Cavaletto | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $106,866 |
80 | Jose L Paniagua | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $106,251 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”