Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Barbara County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 309

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $32,029,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
61Guillen Berry Farms, LLCSanta Maria, CA 93455$221,263
62Kg Berry Farms LLCSanta Maria, CA 93456$199,609
63La Patera Cattle CompanyGoleta, CA 93116$198,529
64Rancho Laguna Farms LLCSanta Maria, CA 93456$193,773
65Valle El Paraiso Berry Farms, LLCSanta Maria, CA 93454$189,062
66Stow Company LLCGoleta, CA 93116$180,867
67Profresco Inc.Santa Maria, CA 93458$177,146
68Gallup & Stribling Orchids LLCCarpinteria, CA 93013$150,979
69Donato Olivera Gomez Dba-donato OSanta Maria, CA 93458$147,632
70Giorgi Ranches IncGoleta, CA 93117$146,256
71Brassica FarmsSanta Maria, CA 93458$138,600
72Area 51 Vineyards LLCBuellton, CA 93427$130,357
73La Mina Harvesting IncSanta Maria, CA 93455$130,226
74Ferniza Farms IncSanta Maria, CA 93456$119,107
75Strawberry Services IncSanta Maria, CA 93456$116,732
76Brassica Wholesale Nursery IncNipomo, CA 93444$116,420
77Faustino Gomez-bba Faustino GomezSanta Maria, CA 93458$113,874
78The Cultured Abalone Farm, LLCGoleta, CA 93117$108,005
79Joseph CavalettoArroyo Grande, CA 93420$106,866
80Jose L PaniaguaSanta Maria, CA 93458$106,251

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag