Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Barbara County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 309

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $32,029,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
81G & G Berry Farms LLCSanta Maria, CA 93456$102,838
82Isidro Leon JimenezSanta Maria, CA 93454$102,354
83Buenaventura Ranch LLCNipomo, CA 93444$101,500
84Hilltop Flowers IncCarpinteria, CA 93014$100,703
85Maira U PaniaguaSanta Maria, CA 93458$100,233
86Riverbench LLCSanta Maria, CA 93454$99,549
87Los Hermanos Harvesting IncSanta Maria, CA 93455$99,381
88Coastal Vineyard Care AssociatesBuellton, CA 93427$97,694
89Esmeralda Lopez Dba-bella Berry FCastroville, CA 95012$96,255
90Hernan Cortez SanchezSanta Maria, CA 93454$95,212
91Robert E WilliamsSanta Maria, CA 93456$93,885
92M. Chavez & Sons Farming IncSanta Maria, CA 93458$92,293
93Alexander Ranch IncCarpinteria, CA 93013$88,623
94Portico Hills Vineyard LLCPlacentia, CA 92870$87,782
95A Casas Farms IncArroyo Grande, CA 93420$84,367
96C&l Farms LLCSanta Maria, CA 93454$83,731
97Hernandez M Produce IncSanta Maria, CA 93458$83,372
98Gold Coast Packing, IncSanta Maria, CA 93458$83,354
99Terra Bella Ranches, LLCSanta Barbara, CA 93111$81,146
100Marina Hernandez MunozSanta Maria, CA 93454$79,940

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag