Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Barbara County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 309

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $32,029,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
101Santa Barbara Exotics IncCarpinteria, CA 93014$79,781
102G.c. Farming Inc.Nipomo, CA 93444$78,854
103Rancho Canada De Los Pinos, LLCPlacentia, CA 92870$78,613
104Larry A DenierPaso Robles, CA 93447$76,830
105Sergio Medrano FelixSanta Maria, CA 93454$75,557
106Francisca LopezSanta Maria, CA 93458$75,513
107Mac Ag IncSanta Maria, CA 93454$73,950
108Carpinteria Fruit Company LLCBakersfield, CA 93309$71,680
109Luis VencesSanta Maria, CA 93458$68,885
110Endow Nursery, Inc.Carpinteria, CA 93013$66,117
111Monte Alban Farms IncSanta Maria, CA 93458$66,106
112Yamaoka FlowersCarpinteria, CA 93013$64,785
113Vazquez Ranch LpLos Angeles, CA 90004$63,042
114Arc Vineyard LLCSanta Maria, CA 93455$61,439
115Leovari Leon LariosSanta Maria, CA 93454$61,262
116Bernardo Flores CervantesSanta Maria, CA 93458$61,165
117J Blair Pence II Dba Pence RanchBuellton, CA 93427$59,850
118Filemon Jarquin Dba Jarquin FarmsSanta Maria, CA 93458$59,818
119Juanita Aguilar Hernandez Dba- Garcia FarmingSanta Maria, CA 93454$59,738
120Leonardo Lopez MartinezSanta Maria, CA 93454$56,430

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag