Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Barbara County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 309

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $32,029,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
121Stargate Ranch LLCGoleta, CA 93117$56,368
122Ciervo Farming Co., LLCOxnard, CA 93031$55,365
123Paulino Lopez MartinezSanta Maria, CA 93455$54,667
124Adalberto BautistaGrover Beach, CA 93483$53,635
125Ricardo RojasSanta Maria, CA 93458$51,931
126Vista Hermosa Harvesting IncSanta Maria, CA 93458$51,298
127Paramount Panels, Inc. Dba Rio Vista VineyardOntario, CA 91761$50,772
128Karam Pistachio Farm IncNewport Beach, CA 92658$50,055
129Broccoli Queen, LLCSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401$49,259
130Mauracher Ranch CorpCarpinteria, CA 93013$47,751
131Mayra Adilene Quintanar MoralesSanta Maria, CA 93455$44,756
132Stow Land Company LLCGoleta, CA 93116$44,753
133Inelba Romero-dba Milpa FarmingSanta Maria, CA 93456$44,246
134Jesus Paez MorenoSanta Maria, CA 93454$44,025
135Ellwood Ranch Inc.Goleta, CA 93117$43,370
136Calhaven LLCSanta Barbara, CA 93108$40,582
137California Tropics IncCarpinteria, CA 93013$40,525
138Santa Barbara Orchid Estate IncSanta Barbara, CA 93111$40,489
139Santa Barbara Farms LLCLompoc, CA 93436$40,000
140Kessler Haak Vineyards LLCLompoc, CA 93436$39,619

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag