Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Barbara County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 309
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $32,029,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Stargate Ranch LLC | Goleta, CA 93117 | $56,368 |
122 | Ciervo Farming Co., LLC | Oxnard, CA 93031 | $55,365 |
123 | Paulino Lopez Martinez | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $54,667 |
124 | Adalberto Bautista | Grover Beach, CA 93483 | $53,635 |
125 | Ricardo Rojas | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $51,931 |
126 | Vista Hermosa Harvesting Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $51,298 |
127 | Paramount Panels, Inc. Dba Rio Vista Vineyard | Ontario, CA 91761 | $50,772 |
128 | Karam Pistachio Farm Inc | Newport Beach, CA 92658 | $50,055 |
129 | Broccoli Queen, LLC | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $49,259 |
130 | Mauracher Ranch Corp | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $47,751 |
131 | Mayra Adilene Quintanar Morales | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $44,756 |
132 | Stow Land Company LLC | Goleta, CA 93116 | $44,753 |
133 | Inelba Romero-dba Milpa Farming | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $44,246 |
134 | Jesus Paez Moreno | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $44,025 |
135 | Ellwood Ranch Inc. | Goleta, CA 93117 | $43,370 |
136 | Calhaven LLC | Santa Barbara, CA 93108 | $40,582 |
137 | California Tropics Inc | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $40,525 |
138 | Santa Barbara Orchid Estate Inc | Santa Barbara, CA 93111 | $40,489 |
139 | Santa Barbara Farms LLC | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $40,000 |
140 | Kessler Haak Vineyards LLC | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $39,619 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”