Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Barbara County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 309

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $32,029,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
141Dal Pozzo Ranch LLCCarpinteria, CA 93013$39,446
142Egt Worldwide 1 LLCMission Viejo, CA 92692$38,610
143New Era Farming IncSanta Maria, CA 93455$38,043
144Ceferino ChengTorrance, CA 90503$36,982
145Mirna Sofia Bonilla De PinedaSanta Maria, CA 93454$35,441
146Maverick Farming Company LLCSanta Maria, CA 93455$34,832
147Cottonwood Canyon VineyardSanta Maria, CA 93454$32,528
148Catarino ChavezSanta Maria, CA 93455$32,105
149Roy Bognuda Dba Bognuda Sons LivestockNipomo, CA 93444$31,900
150Sharyne MerrittCarpinteria, CA 93013$31,814
151Kono & Sons IncCarpinteria, CA 93013$30,036
152Rancho Mesa Escondida, Inc.Carpinteria, CA 93013$29,402
153Pedro Venegas AguilarSanta Maria, CA 93458$27,358
154Manuel AyalaSanta Maria, CA 93454$27,150
155Te Amo Livestock LLCGaviota, CA 93117$27,115
156Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$26,499
157Harrington FarmsMaricopa, CA 93252$26,455
158Williams Livestock LLCBuellton, CA 93427$26,070
159Em Jag C CorporationGoleta, CA 93117$25,783
160Foothill Farms Of Cuyama LLCNew Cuyama, CA 93254$25,285

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag