Emergency Conservation Program in Santa Barbara County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 117
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $1,754,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schulte Ranches | Goleta, CA 93117 | $90,576 |
| 2 | Rancho San Roque Inc | Santa Barbara, CA 93105 | $90,000 |
| 3 | Waken Ray Tseng Temple | El Monte, CA 91732 | $80,700 |
| 4 | Rancho Del Mar Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $72,906 |
| 5 | Rincon Creek Ranch LLC | Oak Park, CA 91377 | $55,658 |
| 6 | Shannon Farms & Custom Harvesting | Lompoc, CA 93438 | $48,980 |
| 7 | Bryan G Mitchell | Reno, NV 89511 | $47,972 |
| 8 | Stefanie P Stevenson | Santa Barbara, CA 93105 | $44,053 |
| 9 | Freitas Brothers Farms LLC | Guadalupe, CA 93434 | $43,622 |
| 10 | Giordani Family Trust Survivors T | Santa Barbara, CA 93103 | $39,188 |
| 11 | Joe Doud | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $38,380 |
| 12 | Parks Land & Cattle Co Inc | Goleta, CA 93117 | $38,158 |
| 13 | American Oak Preserving Company I | North Judson, IN 46366 | $34,285 |
| 14 | Southern Ridge Ranch LLC | Santa Barbara, CA 93110 | $33,002 |
| 15 | La Cumbre Ranch Living Trust | Santa Barbara, CA 93130 | $31,500 |
| 16 | Gerard Kilgallon | San Diego, CA 92121 | $29,813 |
| 17 | Main Street Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $27,972 |
| 18 | Ramirez Bros. Farming | Arroyo Grande, CA 93421 | $26,978 |
| 19 | Mark H Lloyd | Santa Barbara, CA 93110 | $24,938 |
| 20 | Robert Thompson Sr | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $24,283 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf