Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Barbara County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 65
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $986,000 in in 2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Realito Berry Farms Inc | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $376,053 |
| 2 | Big J Produce Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $57,347 |
| 3 | New Hope Harvesting LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $42,332 |
| 4 | Hernandez Farming Co. Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $40,494 |
| 5 | La Palma Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $40,090 |
| 6 | Golden Valley Berries Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $33,200 |
| 7 | Fresh Bounty Of Santa Maria Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $32,329 |
| 8 | La Fuente Farming Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $31,935 |
| 9 | Del Campo Berry Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $29,307 |
| 10 | Guillen Berry Farms, LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $28,860 |
| 11 | Valley Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $19,465 |
| 12 | Donato Olivera Gomez Dba-donato O | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $19,256 |
| 13 | Ferniza Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $15,536 |
| 14 | , | $15,035 | |
| 15 | Jose L Paniagua | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $13,859 |
| 16 | Isidro Leon Jimenez | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $13,351 |
| 17 | Esmeralda Lopez Dba-bella Berry F | Castroville, CA 95012 | $12,555 |
| 18 | Hernan Cortez Sanchez | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $12,419 |
| 19 | M. Chavez & Sons Farming Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $12,038 |
| 20 | Hernandez M Produce Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $10,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
