Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Santa Barbara County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 39
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $181,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rancho San Julian Cattle LLC | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $21,729 |
2 | Ralph Lausten | Santa Ynez, CA 93460 | $16,525 |
3 | Rick Machado | Shandon, CA 93461 | $14,379 |
4 | Ted Chamberlin Ranch LLC | Los Olivos, CA 93441 | $13,026 |
5 | Emery Johnston | New Cuyama, CA 93254 | $12,779 |
6 | Fred E Reyes | Maricopa, CA 93252 | $9,977 |
7 | Tom Thompson | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $9,154 |
8 | James L Rizzoli | Lompoc, CA 93438 | $8,665 |
9 | El Rancho Espanol De Cuyama, No. 1, LLC | New Cuyama, CA 93254 | $7,288 |
10 | Richard Michael | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $6,822 |
11 | Donlon Widle Cattle Company, LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $6,348 |
12 | Kathryn Ashley Parker | Los Olivos, CA 93441 | $5,325 |
13 | Hayes Brothers Ranches | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $5,251 |
14 | La Brea Ranch LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $4,640 |
15 | Justin Garcin | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $4,462 |
16 | Scribner Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $4,259 |
17 | Robert Acquistapace- Dba Tepusquet Cattle Co | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $2,648 |
18 | Hay Bros Sheep Co | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | $2,633 |
19 | Christina Cabral | Lompoc, CA 93438 | $2,295 |
20 | Cheryl Bognuda | Orcutt, CA 93457 | $2,195 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>