Farm Subsidy information
Santa Clara County, California
Total Subsidies in Santa Clara County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 402
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $38,274,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mr Michael N Miller | San Jose, CA 95127 | $119,386 |
62 | San Ysidro Vineyards LLC | Sanger, CA 93657 | $117,989 |
63 | F-v Rose Marie Inc. | San Jose, CA 95129 | $115,588 |
64 | Donald Silacci | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $112,196 |
65 | , | $106,426 | |
66 | Ml Ranch LLC | Galt, CA 95632 | $104,566 |
67 | 101 Equipment Co. | Aromas, CA 95004 | $104,202 |
68 | San Felipe Farms Lp | Hollister, CA 95023 | $102,356 |
69 | Xay Duc Hoang | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $99,057 |
70 | , | $98,771 | |
71 | Joe Chen | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $98,605 |
72 | Vong Farms LLC | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $97,808 |
73 | Xing Hua Zhen | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $94,072 |
74 | Sher Wong | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $91,161 |
75 | Biel Properties Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $87,996 |
76 | Clayton Koopmann | Sunol, CA 94586 | $86,704 |
77 | Mei Huan Huang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $83,278 |
78 | Jim Aira | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $82,723 |
79 | B & P Fruit Company Inc | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $82,249 |
80 | Sally Miller | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $81,894 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”