Total Disaster Programs in Santa Clara County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 204
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $8,981,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Marchese Farms | Saratoga, CA 95070 | $158,650 |
22 | Justin Fields | Coyote, CA 95013 | $137,122 |
23 | Rice-sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $129,347 |
24 | Tilton Ranch Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $122,378 |
25 | Clarie Telles | Farmington, CA 95230 | $113,949 |
26 | Ml Ranch LLC | Galt, CA 95632 | $104,566 |
27 | Joe Vargas | Hollister, CA 95023 | $80,331 |
28 | Donald Silacci | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $79,949 |
29 | Rc Bar Ranch LLC | San Jose, CA 95135 | $76,615 |
30 | Vargas Hay And Cattle LLC | San Jose, CA 95135 | $75,710 |
31 | John Beltran | Freedom, CA 95019 | $69,811 |
32 | Ledeit Bros Family Properties | San Jose, CA 95173 | $68,972 |
33 | Stone Free Farm | Davis, CA 95617 | $67,920 |
34 | Sally Miller | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $62,240 |
35 | Kirk Cattle Company LLC | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $60,459 |
36 | Coyote Creek Land & Cattle Co LLC | Morgan Hill, CA 95038 | $57,234 |
37 | Ljb Farms | San Martin, CA 95046 | $51,332 |
38 | Heidi M Lackey | Livermore, CA 94550 | $50,783 |
39 | Filice Estate Vineyards | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $50,078 |
40 | Anthony G Pierce Sr | San Jose, CA 95135 | $48,939 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”