Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Santa Cruz County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 36 of 36
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Santa Cruz County, California totaled $1,079,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Scurich Berry Farms Inc | Watsonville, CA 95077 | $8,492 |
22 | Anastacio Medrano Dba Medrano's F | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $8,457 |
23 | Sunbright Growers LLC | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $7,906 |
24 | Ruben O. Bermudez Dba Bermudez Fa | Castroville, CA 95012 | $7,139 |
25 | Paul K Tao | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $6,127 |
26 | Jesus Alberto Urias Dba Urias Far | Royal Oaks, CA 95076 | $5,706 |
27 | Zachary Robert Estrada | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $5,361 |
28 | Steven J Webb | Davenport, CA 95017 | $5,254 |
29 | Jose Luis Ramirez | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | $4,257 |
30 | Jack Buchalter | Pescadero, CA 94060 | $3,043 |
31 | Dirty Girl Produce Inc | Santa Cruz, CA 95062 | $2,511 |
32 | Teresa Locatelli | Soquel, CA 95073 | $2,330 |
33 | Antonio Rodriguez Frias | Aromas, CA 95004 | $2,133 |
34 | Mcginnis Ranch LLC | Royal Oaks, CA 95076 | $1,890 |
35 | Cirilo Anaya Bojorques | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $1,874 |
36 | Dennis John Webb | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | $1,184 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
<< Previous