Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Santa Cruz County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 36

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Santa Cruz County, California totaled $1,079,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
1Kitayama Bros IncWatsonville, CA 95077$223,755
2Smith Gardens IncBellingham, WA 98226$176,049
3Fenellas Berries LLCWatsonville, CA 95076$108,612
4Miguel A Ramirez Dba Usa Berry FaCastroville, CA 95012$74,908
5George/diaz Rancho Alitos LLCWatsonville, CA 95077$57,178
6Maria F DerochaRoyal Oaks, CA 95076$42,897
7Af Farms LLCFreedom, CA 95019$37,559
8River Valley Farms LLCAromas, CA 95004$33,537
9Luis SilvaSalinas, CA 93905$33,116
10Agustin Arredondo UrbinaWatsonville, CA 95076$31,454
11Amparo RamirezSalinas, CA 93906$29,812
12Shinta Kawahara Company IncWatsonville, CA 95076$29,450
13Almadelia FernandezWatsonville, CA 95076$26,006
14Abelardo Amador GarciaFreedom, CA 95019$21,655
15Miguel Angel Melgoza-rocha Dba Miguel Angel FarmsWatsonville, CA 95076$21,512
16Rancho Las Palmas GpDavenport, CA 95017$12,655
17Gladys Mirella MondragonWatsonville, CA 95076$11,558
18Alta Vista Farms LpWatsonville, CA 95077$11,390
19N Bar A Ranch LLCSanta Cruz, CA 95060$11,118
20Miguel Ramos Dba Ramos FarmsFreedom, CA 95019$10,665

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag