Market Loss Assistance Program in Shasta County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 50
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Shasta County, California totaled $275,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | River Ranch Lp | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $56,760 |
2 | Walter Matthews | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $24,688 |
3 | Denny Land And Cattle LLC | Burney, CA 96013 | $22,678 |
4 | Mcarthur Livestock | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $20,949 |
5 | Kent A Rianda | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $18,844 |
6 | Peter G Pfendler Trust | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $14,614 |
7 | Mcarthur Ranch Inc | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $14,605 |
8 | Ernest Bruce | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $11,585 |
9 | Bar D Bar Ranch Co LLC | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $9,772 |
10 | Larry L Carpenter | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $8,505 |
11 | Hawes River Acres | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $8,210 |
12 | A & M Farms | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $7,031 |
13 | Arlo Prins | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $6,177 |
14 | Matt Kramer | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $5,860 |
15 | Henry Crane | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $5,509 |
16 | Mcarthur 1989 Trust | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $5,486 |
17 | George Ingram | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $4,078 |
18 | G Ivar Amen | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $4,042 |
19 | A & A Farms | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $4,030 |
20 | Lew A Garbutt | Anderson, CA 96007 | $2,806 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>