Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Solano County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 116
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Solano County, California totaled $9,692,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gilliland Livestock Inc | Davis, CA 95618 | $20,713 |
62 | David A Hamel | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $19,052 |
63 | Kristin Meyer Revocable Trust Dated 03/11/2005 Kri | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $19,017 |
64 | Circle R Ranch | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $18,078 |
65 | Owen Hamel Hill Ranch LLC | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $18,064 |
66 | David G Carrion | Esparto, CA 95627 | $17,037 |
67 | Robin Frost | Petaluma, CA 94953 | $16,795 |
68 | Spencer Wohn | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $16,258 |
69 | Kerry Borges | Benicia, CA 94510 | $15,824 |
70 | Manuel Gamio | Dixon, CA 95620 | $14,769 |
71 | John Bello | Benicia, CA 94510 | $14,461 |
72 | Marcus Bacchi | El Dorado, CA 95623 | $13,910 |
73 | Gordon R Rasmussen | Pleasanton, CA 94588 | $13,702 |
74 | John Robert Harris | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $13,459 |
75 | Shady Lane Farm | Danville, CA 94526 | $13,432 |
76 | Richard Silva | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $13,403 |
77 | Jeanne Anderson | Birds Landing, CA 94512 | $11,775 |
78 | Doniphan H Hanes | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $11,612 |
79 | J Terry Moroney | Winters, CA 95694 | $10,501 |
80 | , | $10,486 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”