Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Solano County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 46
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Solano County, California totaled $1,047,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R Emigh Livestock | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $117,875 |
| 2 | Detar Livestock Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $116,155 |
| 3 | Hamilton Brothers | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $114,006 |
| 4 | Sl Cattle Co Inc | Alamo, CA 94507 | $102,216 |
| 5 | Ian & Margaret Anderson Dba E A Anderson & Son | Birds Landing, CA 94512 | $83,044 |
| 6 | William Everett | Benicia, CA 94510 | $75,649 |
| 7 | Bolin Farming Co LLC | Alamo, CA 94507 | $55,102 |
| 8 | Jamieson Canyon Ranch | American Canyon, CA 94503 | $53,117 |
| 9 | Tolenas Springs Cattle Company | Dixon, CA 95620 | $49,036 |
| 10 | Neil A Anderson | Birds Landing, CA 94512 | $28,228 |
| 11 | Rod Mcgrew | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $26,000 |
| 12 | D & R Livestock | Dixon, CA 95620 | $18,894 |
| 13 | D3 Enterprises LLC | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $18,861 |
| 14 | Alberta Nunes | El Sobrante, CA 94803 | $14,738 |
| 15 | J F & R W Dittmer | Fairfield, CA 94534 | $14,354 |
| 16 | Martin Emigh | Dixon, CA 95620 | $13,193 |
| 17 | Bill Bishop Trust | Napa, CA 94558 | $12,570 |
| 18 | Ahart Livestock Inc | Suisun City, CA 94585 | $11,137 |
| 19 | Atkinson Farms II Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $10,882 |
| 20 | Scott Stone | Woodland, CA 95695 | $10,677 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
