Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Solano County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 138
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Solano County, California totaled $2,826,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sl Cattle Co Inc | Alamo, CA 94507 | $253,687 |
2 | Hamilton Brothers | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $204,832 |
3 | Martin Emigh | Dixon, CA 95620 | $120,015 |
4 | Ian & Margaret Anderson Dba E A Anderson & Son | Birds Landing, CA 94512 | $102,362 |
5 | Alberta Nunes | El Sobrante, CA 94803 | $101,685 |
6 | Jamieson Canyon Ranch | American Canyon, CA 94503 | $81,123 |
7 | Bee Happy Apiaries | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $73,689 |
8 | Edward A & Ian Anderson | Birds Landing, CA 94512 | $66,338 |
9 | William Everett | Benicia, CA 94510 | $63,568 |
10 | Five Dot Land & Cattle Co | Standish, CA 96128 | $63,295 |
11 | Schene Enterprises Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $62,221 |
12 | Timothy Wellman | Birds Lndg, CA 94585 | $57,940 |
13 | Coelho Ranches | Fremont, CA 94539 | $57,578 |
14 | Greg Tonnesen | Birds Lndg, CA 94585 | $57,048 |
15 | Detar Livestock | Dixon, CA 95620 | $56,695 |
16 | J F & R W Dittmer | Fairfield, CA 94534 | $51,446 |
17 | Honey Bee Genetics Inc | Vacaville, CA 95696 | $46,734 |
18 | Detar Livestock Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $46,612 |
19 | Bermudez Brothers | Winters, CA 95694 | $46,024 |
20 | George Sequeira | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $44,067 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>