Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Stanislaus County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 177
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Stanislaus County, California totaled $455,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Melvin T Wheeler & Sons Lp | Modesto, CA 95358 | $17,685 |
| 2 | Haringa Dairy | Denair, CA 95316 | $11,867 |
| 3 | Joe B Martin Dba Martin Land & Cattle | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $11,158 |
| 4 | Robert Gioletti & Sons Dairy Inc | Turlock, CA 95380 | $10,147 |
| 5 | A & M De Sousa Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $9,207 |
| 6 | Edwin H Smith & Sons | Denair, CA 95316 | $8,767 |
| 7 | Martins Farm Lp | Modesto, CA 95358 | $8,491 |
| 8 | Rivercrest Cattle Company | Ripon, CA 95366 | $8,284 |
| 9 | Island Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $8,214 |
| 10 | Gary Osmundson 6-x Dairy | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $8,153 |
| 11 | Jordao Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $7,045 |
| 12 | Tony Meirinho & Sons Dairy Lp | Modesto, CA 95358 | $6,622 |
| 13 | Ackerman Dairy Inc | Ceres, CA 95307 | $6,043 |
| 14 | Marchy Dairy | Ceres, CA 95307 | $5,961 |
| 15 | S & S Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $5,961 |
| 16 | Arnaldo P Avila & Sons Dairy Lp | Modesto, CA 95358 | $5,898 |
| 17 | Manuel R Furtado | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $5,811 |
| 18 | Pete Postma & Sons Dairy | Empire, CA 95319 | $5,783 |
| 19 | Robert Brennan | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $5,248 |
| 20 | Joe A Brennan | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $5,248 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf