Total Disaster Programs in Sutter County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 378
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $17,649,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Alexander C Magenheimer | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $104,120 |
42 | J & M Farms A Partnership | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $101,695 |
43 | Baten Farming LLC | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $100,573 |
44 | Montna Farms, A Community Property Farm | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $98,914 |
45 | La Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $96,285 |
46 | Piara Gosal | Gridley, CA 95948 | $93,832 |
47 | K & J Partnership | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $92,903 |
48 | Double D Farms | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $92,729 |
49 | Penning Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $91,799 |
50 | Zenda Farms Inc | San Bruno, CA 94066 | $91,791 |
51 | Snake Creek Ranch Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $90,499 |
52 | , | $90,063 | |
53 | Jeffrey Catlett Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $89,968 |
54 | Charanjit & Shangara Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $86,743 |
55 | Fortune Farmstead Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $85,780 |
56 | Mcpherrin-damboriena Sheep Co | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $85,673 |
57 | Quinterland Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $85,259 |
58 | G P J Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $85,205 |
59 | Twin Peaks Ag Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $81,818 |
60 | Anthony Giusti | Chico, CA 95973 | $81,254 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”