Total Disaster Programs in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,580
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $80,108,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sukhraj Pamma Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $2,165,495 |
2 | Reason Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $1,294,973 |
3 | Ravi And Jay Thiara Farms | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $1,216,487 |
4 | Golden Valley Orchards LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $1,101,808 |
5 | Bains Brothers | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $918,008 |
6 | B E Giovannetti & Sons | Woodland, CA 95695 | $699,965 |
7 | Royal Land LLC | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $666,820 |
8 | Thiara Company | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $591,074 |
9 | Johl Company | Marysville, CA 95901 | $524,327 |
10 | Matteoli Bros | Robbins, CA 95676 | $517,776 |
11 | Dale Ranches | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $468,958 |
12 | Sundeep Dale | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $456,713 |
13 | Matsumura Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $445,319 |
14 | Mcpherrin-damboriena Sheep Co | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $433,422 |
15 | Manseena Orchards Gp | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $426,345 |
16 | Ajit S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $412,370 |
17 | Waters Ranches | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $394,942 |
18 | Krehe & Krehe | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $394,511 |
19 | Cal West Walnut | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $393,318 |
20 | Oji Bros Farm Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $380,150 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>