Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Sutter County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 443
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $5,607,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jonathan A Devalentine | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $19,857 |
62 | Daddow & Sons Farming | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $19,817 |
63 | Krehe & Krehe | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $19,657 |
64 | Kurtis J Bianchi | Durham, CA 95938 | $19,552 |
65 | J & M Farms A Partnership | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $19,521 |
66 | Gill Ranch Partnership | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $19,470 |
67 | Bell Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $19,433 |
68 | Leo Michel And Sons | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $19,388 |
69 | Blarneystone Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $18,980 |
70 | Nelson Family Farms Inc | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $18,616 |
71 | Kimura Bros | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $18,247 |
72 | Maxwell Daddow | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $18,185 |
73 | West Wheatland Inc | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $17,850 |
74 | Hawn Ranch Co | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $17,521 |
75 | Gurjit Takher | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $17,479 |
76 | Schmidl Farms Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $17,179 |
77 | Mckenzie Seed | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $16,950 |
78 | River Bottom Ranch II LLC | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $16,927 |
79 | G A Farms Inc | Woodland, CA 95776 | $16,794 |
80 | Park Farming | Meridian, CA 95957 | $16,698 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”