Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Sutter County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 792
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $25,239,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Schreiner Brothers | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $703,279 |
2 | Dougherty Brothers | Robbins, CA 95676 | $477,965 |
3 | Richter Bros Inc | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $467,661 |
4 | Reason Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $396,776 |
5 | Van Ruiten Bros | Robbins, CA 95676 | $392,116 |
6 | Jmt Lp | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $312,401 |
7 | Rai Bros Farming | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $307,477 |
8 | Sukhraj Pamma Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $297,626 |
9 | Quad-h Ranches Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $266,949 |
10 | Park Farming | Meridian, CA 95957 | $261,597 |
11 | Sunrise Orchards | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $256,758 |
12 | Ajit S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $250,000 |
13 | Gurjit Singh Gosal | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $250,000 |
14 | Richard Taylor | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $250,000 |
15 | Harmon Thiara | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $250,000 |
16 | Royal Land LLC | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $250,000 |
17 | California Valley Nut Co LLC | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $250,000 |
18 | Piara Gosal | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $240,724 |
19 | Pamma Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $233,254 |
20 | Oji Bros Farm Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $231,519 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>