Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Sutter County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 443
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $5,607,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Tumber Family Survivor's Trust A | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $16,483 |
82 | Ma2h Gp | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $16,349 |
83 | Brian C Mckenzie | Plumas Lake, CA 95961 | $16,148 |
84 | Great Oak Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $16,073 |
85 | Seth Van Dyke | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $15,761 |
86 | Tamra S Nelson | Newcastle, CA 95658 | $15,168 |
87 | George M Pagany | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $15,099 |
88 | Michael Tarke | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $14,847 |
89 | Charles J Roberts | Sutter, CA 95982 | $14,841 |
90 | Shannon Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $14,775 |
91 | Deanna Moroni Dba Moroni Ranch | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $13,991 |
92 | Gregory E Driver | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $13,979 |
93 | Alves-minton Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $13,913 |
94 | Lauppe And Son | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $13,881 |
95 | Richard & Laurel Nelson Jt Vt | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $13,787 |
96 | M & D Farms LLC | Sacramento, CA 95841 | $13,720 |
97 | La Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $12,762 |
98 | Jack Alves | Woodland, CA 95695 | $12,640 |
99 | Moroni Farming & Leasing Inc | Sutter, CA 95982 | $12,591 |
100 | Sandhar Orchards | Sacramento, CA 95829 | $12,493 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”