Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Sutter County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 443
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $5,607,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Davis-emery Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $12,454 |
102 | Roberta M Schreiner | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $12,401 |
103 | Inline Hay Services Inc | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $12,239 |
104 | M & H Farming Enterprises | Folsom, CA 95630 | $12,059 |
105 | Andrew E Jansen | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $12,059 |
106 | Roma Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $11,920 |
107 | Tokaneke Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $11,897 |
108 | Double D Farms | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $11,872 |
109 | R Singh Farms | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $11,762 |
110 | Julie Filter-correll | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $11,737 |
111 | Austin Lemenager Et Al 69 Ranch | Sutter, CA 95982 | $11,686 |
112 | Kurt E Boeger | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $11,621 |
113 | Rick B Heryford | Sutter, CA 95982 | $11,537 |
114 | Mora Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $11,363 |
115 | Acorn Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $11,076 |
116 | Bucklebury Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $11,053 |
117 | Amrik Cheema | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $10,993 |
118 | John Marler Farming | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $10,800 |
119 | Alec Penning | Woodland, CA 95776 | $10,788 |
120 | Bryant Ranch | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $10,626 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”