Total Disaster Programs in Sutter County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 378
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $17,649,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Acorn Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $53,276 |
102 | Chesini Farms Inc | Meridian, CA 95957 | $50,405 |
103 | Schmidl Farms Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $49,964 |
104 | Naranjan Singh | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $49,652 |
105 | Blarneystone Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $49,322 |
106 | Hunt Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $48,793 |
107 | Manseena Orchards Gp | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $48,420 |
108 | Pamma Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $47,928 |
109 | Miani Farms | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $47,169 |
110 | Dnh Farms LLC | Sacramento, CA 95818 | $47,060 |
111 | Rick B Heryford | Sutter, CA 95982 | $46,759 |
112 | Anderson Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $46,427 |
113 | Sukhdev S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $46,202 |
114 | Richland Enterprises LLC | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $46,170 |
115 | Penning Family Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $45,122 |
116 | Evans Farming LLC | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $44,866 |
117 | Derby Orchards | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $44,806 |
118 | Tumber Family Survivor's Trust A | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $44,512 |
119 | Taresh Farms Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $44,330 |
120 | B S B Ranch LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $44,152 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”