Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 79
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $1,020,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Matsumura Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $216,134 |
2 | Ray Zachary | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $52,487 |
3 | Mary F Cox | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $50,200 |
4 | Mohinder Singh Ghag | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $48,999 |
5 | Estate Of James E Thomas | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $46,619 |
6 | Steve Samra | Elk Grove, CA 95758 | $45,471 |
7 | La Rocca Vineyard | Forest Ranch, CA 95942 | $37,948 |
8 | Sierra Kiwi International | Marysville, CA 95901 | $37,857 |
9 | Parmjit S Uppal | Santa Rosa, CA 95405 | $32,515 |
10 | Amerjit S Bhatti | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $32,302 |
11 | Kiran K Bhatti | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $32,302 |
12 | Golden State Kiwi Ranch Ltd | Redondo Beach, CA 90277 | $24,532 |
13 | Sukhraj Singh Pamma | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $22,885 |
14 | Cheyenne Realty Inc | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $21,986 |
15 | Dora D Wood | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $19,962 |
16 | Mcpherrin-damboriena Sheep Co | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $18,053 |
17 | Hardave Dulai | Gridley, CA 95948 | $16,706 |
18 | Piara & Kulwant Gosal | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $15,459 |
19 | Melton Nursery | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $12,384 |
20 | Florabunda Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $11,662 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>