Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Sutter County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 290
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $8,535,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Joe And Cleo Schreiner Farming | Woodland, CA 95695 | $58,633 |
42 | John & Catherine Klein | Woodland, CA 95695 | $58,152 |
43 | Robert B Gallagher | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $55,399 |
44 | Hoppin Family Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $54,752 |
45 | Rice Farms Partnership | Houston, TX 77227 | $53,457 |
46 | M & D Farms LLC | Sacramento, CA 95841 | $52,587 |
47 | Moroni Farming & Leasing Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $51,859 |
48 | Five Way Farming | Sutter, CA 95982 | $50,617 |
49 | Daddow & Sons Farming | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $49,601 |
50 | Tristan Nelson | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $49,467 |
51 | Andrew E Jansen | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $49,359 |
52 | Rpm Farms | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $48,783 |
53 | Frank Alonso Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $48,326 |
54 | Blarneystone Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $47,648 |
55 | Hoffart Trust | Robbins, CA 95676 | $45,565 |
56 | Jack & Merilyn Scheidel | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $45,145 |
57 | Fjr Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $42,689 |
58 | Joe's Girls | Woodland, CA 95695 | $42,286 |
59 | Roma Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $42,185 |
60 | Nuevo Farms | Sacramento, CA 95841 | $41,662 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”