Oilseed Program in Yolo County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 394
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in Yolo County, California totaled $824,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Rios Farms Inc | Davis, CA 95617 | $66,428 |
2 | River Garden Farms Company | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $49,738 |
3 | Gregory Schmid | Davis, CA 95617 | $32,530 |
4 | Ashley Payne Revocable Trust Date | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $28,502 |
5 | George Aoki Farms Inc | Woodland, CA 95776 | $26,588 |
6 | Dan Best Ranch Inc | Woodland, CA 95776 | $22,689 |
7 | Eastman Ranch | Woodland, CA 95776 | $21,022 |
8 | Slater Farms Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $20,971 |
9 | S H Merwin And Sons Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $16,784 |
10 | Reclamation District No 108 | Grimes, CA 95950 | $16,583 |
11 | Merwin Vineyards Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $15,722 |
12 | Joe Heidrick Enterprises Inc | Woodland, CA 95695 | $13,562 |
13 | Gary Alvernaz Enterprises | Sacramento, CA 95834 | $13,060 |
14 | Geer Ranch A Partnership | Woodland, CA 95695 | $12,809 |
15 | Heidrick Farms Inc | Woodland, CA 95695 | $12,691 |
16 | Neves And Son | Sacramento, CA 95831 | $12,604 |
17 | Kenneth Gregory | Woodland, CA 95776 | $12,532 |
18 | Rominger Brothers Farms Inc | Winters, CA 95694 | $11,842 |
19 | Joe Yeung Farms Inc | West Sacramento, CA 95691 | $10,897 |
20 | Schaupp Farms | Esparto, CA 95627 | $10,652 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>