Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Yolo County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 18 of 18
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Yolo County, California totaled $1,428,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Henry Harlan Dba Bullfrog Bee's | Woodland, CA 95695 | $422,186 |
2 | Tauzer Apiaries, Inc | Woodland, CA 95776 | $418,657 |
3 | Bz-bee Pollination Inc | Esparto, CA 95627 | $298,842 |
4 | Alexander Markevich | Rio Linda, CA 95673 | $56,319 |
5 | Yolo Land & Cattle Co | Woodland, CA 95695 | $47,957 |
6 | Producers Livestock Marketing Association | North Salt Lake, UT 84054 | $35,016 |
7 | Victor Andreychenko | West Sacramento, CA 95691 | $31,907 |
8 | Stanley & Lela Holland | Brooks, CA 95606 | $31,906 |
9 | Pete's Valley Cattle LLC | Woodland, CA 95776 | $27,965 |
10 | Schene Enterprises Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $19,753 |
11 | Marc Jaconetti | Woodland, CA 95695 | $8,701 |
12 | David G Carrion | Esparto, CA 95627 | $6,949 |
13 | Mission Livestock Management | Dixon, CA 95620 | $6,796 |
14 | Wild Adventure Paintball Inc | Zamora, CA 95698 | $6,055 |
15 | Cleveland Bellard | Guinda, CA 95637 | $4,812 |
16 | Angelo Stanton | Guinda, CA 95637 | $2,406 |
17 | Christine B De Maria | Guinda, CA 95637 | $1,684 |
18 | Robben Cattle Co LLC | Dixon, CA 95620 | $131 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”