Total Disaster Programs in Colorado, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 8,595
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Colorado totaled $318,303,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Anthony Schaffert | Otis, CO 80743 | $278,066 |
122 | Max L Noland Family Limited Partn | Palisade, CO 81526 | $277,031 |
123 | May Farms | Lamar, CO 81052 | $276,926 |
124 | Eric E White | Cortez, CO 81321 | $275,815 |
125 | Oldland Brothers Inc | Rifle, CO 81650 | $275,692 |
126 | Stuart Eskew | Pritchett, CO 81064 | $275,393 |
127 | Riemenschneider Brothers | Ordway, CO 81063 | $272,671 |
128 | Charles Klausner Damian Klausner George Klausner P | Roggen, CO 80652 | $270,415 |
129 | Lime Creek Four | Manter, KS 67862 | $270,216 |
130 | Roxanna Marie Campbell | Buena Vista, CO 81211 | $269,060 |
131 | Monte Sammons | Kim, CO 81049 | $268,992 |
132 | Nottingham Land & Livestock Lllp | Craig, CO 81626 | $268,697 |
133 | Scott Farms Partnership | Walsh, CO 81090 | $268,490 |
134 | Smith Rancho Land & Livestock LLC | Craig, CO 81626 | $268,442 |
135 | Schenck Partners | Holly, CO 81047 | $267,955 |
136 | Peterson Farms LLC | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $267,008 |
137 | , | $266,898 | |
138 | Collie Farms Partnership | Arriba, CO 80804 | $266,150 |
139 | Nottingham Ranch Company | Burns, CO 80426 | $265,659 |
140 | Pargin Ranch Ltd | Ignacio, CO 81137 | $264,463 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”