Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Connecticut, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 257
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Connecticut totaled $1,385,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rowledge Pond Aquaculture LLC | Sandy Hook, CT 06482 | $108,055 |
2 | Laurelbrook Farm LLC | East Canaan, CT 06024 | $73,840 |
3 | Freunds Farm Inc | East Canaan, CT 06024 | $65,874 |
4 | Spruce Hill Farms | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $52,500 |
5 | Oakridge Dairy LLC | Ellington, CT 06029 | $44,228 |
6 | Elm Knoll Farm | East Canaan, CT 06024 | $37,308 |
7 | Bernard Tanner | New Preston, CT 06777 | $35,000 |
8 | Windsway Farm | Coventry, CT 06238 | $35,000 |
9 | Christoforo's Northford Gardens I | Northford, CT 06472 | $24,500 |
10 | Giuseppe Diglio | Northford, CT 06472 | $24,345 |
11 | Daniel Rayner Logue | Woodbury, CT 06798 | $21,000 |
12 | Evergreen Berry Farm | Watertown, CT 06795 | $19,849 |
13 | Gary A Piszczek Hellgate Farm | Preston, CT 06365 | $17,500 |
14 | Creamery Brook Bison LLC | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $17,210 |
15 | Bahler Farms Inc | Ellington, CT 06029 | $17,149 |
16 | Frederick B Plumb III | Litchfield, CT 06759 | $16,892 |
17 | J C Farm And Greenhouses LLC | Durham, CT 06422 | $16,875 |
18 | Blue Hills Orchard Inc | Wallingford, CT 06492 | $14,195 |
19 | Robin A Chesmer | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $14,000 |
20 | Jill Hubbell | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $13,979 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>