Margin Protection Program in Connecticut, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 75
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in Connecticut totaled $35,603 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Molodich Farms Inc | Moosup, CT 06354 | $11,719 |
| 2 | Freunds Farm Inc | East Canaan, CT 06024 | $3,688 |
| 3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,760 |
| 4 | Beriah Lewis Farm Inc | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $594 |
| 5 | Maple Leaf Farm Inc | Hebron, CT 06248 | $588 |
| 6 | Tyler Brothers | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $588 |
| 7 | Palmer Farm | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $585 |
| 8 | Heckler Brothers LLC | Coventry, CT 06238 | $585 |
| 9 | Shawn Mcgillicuddy Dba Square A Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $583 |
| 10 | Logue Farms Inc | Woodbury, CT 06798 | $580 |
| 11 | Fort Hill Farms LLC | Thompson, CT 06277 | $577 |
| 12 | Fairholm Farm Inc | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $573 |
| 13 | Woodhill, LLC | Hampton, CT 06247 | $573 |
| 14 | Hytone Farm LLC | Coventry, CT 06238 | $573 |
| 15 | Valleyside Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $567 |
| 16 | Graywall Farms LLC | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $564 |
| 17 | Spielman Farm LLC | Baltic, CT 06330 | $549 |
| 18 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $490 |
| 19 | Charles Greenbacker & Sons LLC | Durham, CT 06422 | $418 |
| 20 | Margaret S Salvas Spruce Hill Farms | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $396 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf