Deficiency Payment in Hartford County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 26
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Hartford County, Connecticut totaled $59,282 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Minnechaug Farms-michael & Paul L | Glastonbury, CT 06033 | $12,472 |
2 | Kasheta Farms Inc | South Windsor, CT 06074 | $5,697 |
3 | House Of Hayes | North Granby, CT 06060 | $4,762 |
4 | Meadow Park Farm-philip M Grant | Broad Brook, CT 06016 | $4,293 |
5 | Hastings Farm | Suffield, CT 06078 | $3,710 |
6 | Peter Krell | Farmington, CT 06032 | $3,414 |
7 | Collins Powder Hill Farm | Enfield, CT 06082 | $3,114 |
8 | Gottier Farms | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $2,970 |
9 | Mountain View Farms | Granby, CT 06035 | $2,810 |
10 | Davetta M Curtiss | Suffield, CT 06078 | $2,452 |
11 | David H Dingess | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $2,068 |
12 | Benjamin J Bielonko II | Suffield, CT 06078 | $1,907 |
13 | Leo A Grouten II | Farmington, CT 06032 | $1,750 |
14 | Sheldon Mel Farm Gp | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $1,464 |
15 | Norman Coulter | Suffield, CT 06078 | $1,408 |
16 | Earl A Reichle | South Windsor, CT 06074 | $1,013 |
17 | James P Allen | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $928 |
18 | Dingess Farm | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $813 |
19 | Munson Brothers | Kensington, CT 06037 | $726 |
20 | David Hein | Unionville, CT 06085 | $690 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>