Total Conservation Programs in Florida, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 8,194

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Florida totaled $112,127,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1St John River Water Management DiPalatka, FL 32178$3,119,676
2Florida Association Of Rc&d CouncOrlando, FL 32822$2,024,303
3Ducks UnlimitedBismarck, ND 58503$1,121,979
4711 Ranch Limited PartnershipKenansville, FL 34739$1,040,812
5M. Lewis Hall Protective TestamenPunta Gorda, FL 33982$960,000
6Griswold FarmsPace, FL 32571$620,737
7Jumpie Run Plantation LtdGainesville, FL 32614$549,232
8Geraldine C M Livingston FoundatiGreenville, FL 32331$445,641
9Kenansville Cattle LtdSaint Cloud, FL 34772$436,464
10Foshalee Management IncTallahassee, FL 32312$416,484
11Hankins MathewsMilton, FL 32570$411,583
12Bennie E Davis JrCottondale, FL 32431$390,528
13Palustris Products LlpAtmore, AL 36504$368,082
14Swift Timber LlpAtmore, AL 36504$368,081
15Premier Citrus LLCWilson, AR 72395$367,500
16Secret Promise LtdSaint Petersburg, FL 33731$338,550
17Millicent NoelIndialantic, FL 32903$301,261
18Marianne M MillerMonticello, FL 32344$300,275
19Russakis Ranch LLCFort Pierce, FL 34951$300,000
20Red Hills Land CoReisterstown, MD 21136$297,463

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>


Farm Subsidies Education