Emergency Conservation Program in Dade County, Florida, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 161
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Dade County, Florida totaled $4,208,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brooks Tropicals LLC | Homestead, FL 33031 | $200,000 |
2 | Everbloom Growers Inc | Homestead, FL 33031 | $196,170 |
3 | Arziki Nursery, LLC | Homestead, FL 33033 | $166,538 |
4 | Traditions Tree Farm, LLC | Homestead, FL 33031 | $130,217 |
5 | Andersen Nursery Farm | Homestead, FL 33031 | $104,051 |
6 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $96,566 |
7 | Sg Grove Care, Inc. | Homestead, FL 33031 | $93,204 |
8 | Bryan St Germain | Homestead, FL 33031 | $85,922 |
9 | Stephen T Garrison | Homestead, FL 33090 | $77,631 |
10 | Specialist Growers Inc | Homestead, FL 33031 | $76,412 |
11 | Benjamina Nursery | Miami, FL 33187 | $70,365 |
12 | King Palms Inc | Miami, FL 33177 | $67,500 |
13 | Ortega Nursery Farms Inc | Miami, FL 33175 | $66,353 |
14 | Mayra Nursery Inc | Florida City, FL 33034 | $65,073 |
15 | Exotic Agronomics Enterprises Inc | Coral Gables, FL 33134 | $61,347 |
16 | Quality Foliage Inc | Florida City, FL 33034 | $60,612 |
17 | Richard Rafter D/b/a Powerline Tr | Princeton, FL 33032 | $60,330 |
18 | Alpha Botanical Inc | Homestead, FL 33031 | $59,937 |
19 | Mirtica And Sons Corp | Miami, FL 33175 | $58,106 |
20 | South Produce Farm LLC | Florida City, FL 33034 | $57,622 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>