Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Glades County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 126
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Glades County, Florida totaled $1,647,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Donald Peeples | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $153,411 |
2 | Byron Storey | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $131,207 |
3 | Pearce Ranch Inc | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $83,133 |
4 | Syfrett Ranch Inc | Okeechobee, FL 34973 | $76,525 |
5 | D L Pearce Ranch Inc | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $72,119 |
6 | Fitz Hugh Williams III | Okeechobee, FL 34973 | $65,499 |
7 | Rio Rancho Corp | Okeechobee, FL 34972 | $57,972 |
8 | Goodno Ranch Inc | Miami, FL 33101 | $56,510 |
9 | Reuben Kimberly Bullard | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $49,525 |
10 | Robert B Oxer Jr | Venus, FL 33960 | $48,331 |
11 | Mark Hunter Pearce | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $45,765 |
12 | C & S Citrus Service Inc | Lake Placid, FL 33852 | $43,703 |
13 | Timothy G Mudge | Labelle, FL 33935 | $30,936 |
14 | Woodrow O'neal Sr | South Bay, FL 33493 | $29,769 |
15 | Calusa Cattle Co LLC | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $29,247 |
16 | Gillie C Russell | Lake Placid, FL 33862 | $25,886 |
17 | Mark A Pearce | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $24,914 |
18 | Tommy Bronson | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $24,812 |
19 | R Matt Pearce | Okeechobee, FL 34972 | $22,922 |
20 | James Beaty | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $20,686 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>