Tree Assistance Program in Indian River County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 30
Recipients of Tree Assistance Program from farms in Indian River County, Florida totaled $1,612,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tree Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Robert J Lindsey | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $263,006 |
2 | Estes Citrus Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $199,669 |
3 | Lynn B Lindsey | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $188,808 |
4 | Thomas S Hammond | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $119,973 |
5 | Banack Family Limited Partnership | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $108,291 |
6 | Img Citrus Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32967 | $99,089 |
7 | Lambeth Citrus Ltd | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $97,446 |
8 | Riverfront Packing Company | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $66,375 |
9 | Fellsmere Joint Venture LLC | Fellsmere, FL 32948 | $65,484 |
10 | M & V LLC | Groveland, FL 34736 | $63,828 |
11 | Daniel M Rooney | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $56,478 |
12 | Estes Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $49,397 |
13 | S R Burch & Sons Inc | Winter Garden, FL 34787 | $36,694 |
14 | Vero Beach 224 LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $29,024 |
15 | Seibels Enterprises Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $28,427 |
16 | Johnston Properties Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $26,072 |
17 | High Brix Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $19,540 |
18 | Earl Austin Hobbs III | Vero Beach, FL 32967 | $15,762 |
19 | Pound Solids, Inc. | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $14,282 |
20 | Lindsey Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $14,001 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>