Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Palm Beach County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 22
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Palm Beach County, Florida totaled $65,056 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wilder Brothers Farms Inc. | Pahokee, FL 33476 | $7,000 |
2 | Sugar & Spice Inc | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $3,600 |
3 | Pioneer Ranch & Sugar | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $3,539 |
4 | Malcolm L Moss Jr | West Palm Beach, FL 33414 | $3,500 |
5 | J T Boynton Farms | Pahokee, FL 33476 | $3,500 |
6 | Six Mile Bend Corp | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $3,500 |
7 | Triple F Farms Inc. | Pahokee, FL 33476 | $3,500 |
8 | Kennedy Farms Inc | Pahokee, FL 33476 | $3,500 |
9 | R C Hatton Inc | Pahokee, FL 33476 | $3,500 |
10 | Red Devon Ranch Inc | Pahokee, FL 33476 | $3,500 |
11 | Sativa Farms Inc | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $3,500 |
12 | Sun Dance Farms Inc | South Bay, FL 33493 | $3,479 |
13 | Johnson Farms Inc | West Palm Beach, FL 33402 | $3,200 |
14 | Lewis Friend Farms Inc | Pahokee, FL 33476 | $3,005 |
15 | El Rodeo Investment Corp | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $2,739 |
16 | Repper Farms, Inc. | Canal Point, FL 33438 | $2,363 |
17 | Capella Farms Inc | Boca Raton, FL 33427 | $2,184 |
18 | Chamblee Farms Inc | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $1,799 |
19 | Estate Of Hub Spooner | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $1,407 |
20 | W E Mckinstry Inc | Pahokee, FL 33476 | $1,350 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>