Biomass Crop Assistance Program in Palm Beach County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 37
Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in Palm Beach County, Florida totaled $16,855,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Biomass Crop Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A Duda & Sons Inc | Oviedo, FL 32762 | $4,835,732 |
| 2 | Big B Sugar Corporation | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $2,946,619 |
| 3 | Wedgworth Farms Inc | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $1,866,119 |
| 4 | Hundley Farms Inc | Loxahatchee, FL 33470 | $979,764 |
| 5 | Star Farms Corp | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $933,660 |
| 6 | Lee Timber Company Inc | Fort Myers, FL 33902 | $881,101 |
| 7 | Star Ranch Enterprises Inc | Hollywood, FL 33020 | $618,479 |
| 8 | Roth Farms Inc | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $589,168 |
| 9 | Eastgate Farms Inc | Winter Park, FL 32790 | $520,765 |
| 10 | Robert C Hatton Inc | Pahokee, FL 33476 | $450,686 |
| 11 | Closter Farms Inc | Loxahatchee, FL 33470 | $364,336 |
| 12 | William Kennedy Farms Inc | Pahokee, FL 33476 | $361,422 |
| 13 | Consolidated Resource Recovery In | Sarasota, FL 34243 | $144,763 |
| 14 | G Mc Enterprises Inc | Clewiston, FL 33440 | $140,799 |
| 15 | Stein Sugar Farms Inc | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $138,336 |
| 16 | Trucane Sugar Corporation | West Palm Beach, FL 33416 | $127,677 |
| 17 | Lewis Friend Farms Inc | Pahokee, FL 33476 | $124,476 |
| 18 | Engelhart Grinding LLC | Fort Myers, FL 33917 | $124,026 |
| 19 | Dave Foote Environmental Construc | Fort Myers, FL 33905 | $108,699 |
| 20 | Pioneer Ranch & Sugar | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $87,467 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf