Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Saint Lucie County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 107
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Saint Lucie County, Florida totaled $5,285,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Riverside Citrus Harvesting LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $61,366 |
22 | Bowden Family Holdings Ltd | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $60,045 |
23 | Seaventure Clam Co | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | $56,891 |
24 | Mcdermid Groves LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34950 | $55,071 |
25 | Rainbow Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34948 | $54,235 |
26 | Agricoastal Growers Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $52,946 |
27 | Miller Ranch & Cattle LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34947 | $51,150 |
28 | Citrus Star Inc | Homestead, FL 33030 | $45,499 |
29 | Diamond 3 Cattle Company LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $45,320 |
30 | Mancil's Tractor Service Inc | Palm City, FL 34990 | $36,813 |
31 | Na Florida LLC | Houston, TX 77039 | $31,365 |
32 | Tri-county Farms, LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34947 | $30,195 |
33 | Circle I Ranch | Port Saint Lucie, FL 34987 | $20,680 |
34 | Grace Ag Consulting Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34979 | $20,556 |
35 | Sandscrub LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $19,800 |
36 | L & G Groves, LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $18,977 |
37 | Flying L Cattle LLC | Lake Wales, FL 33898 | $18,040 |
38 | Vicus Livestock LLC | Miami, FL 33186 | $17,325 |
39 | Maria Teresa E Flores Inc | Port Saint Lucie, FL 34983 | $16,892 |
40 | Aquaco LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $15,692 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”