Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Saint Lucie County, Florida, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 19 of 19
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Saint Lucie County, Florida totaled $1,524,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wescott Groves LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $473,131 |
2 | Scott Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $271,959 |
3 | Img Citrus Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32967 | $250,000 |
4 | Snapper Creek Nsy LLC | Miami, FL 33116 | $200,425 |
5 | Palms Direct LLC | Port Saint Lucie, FL 34983 | $90,544 |
6 | Bcrl Farms Inc Dba Sun Turf | Port St Lucie, FL 34987 | $73,149 |
7 | Seaventure Clam Co | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | $56,891 |
8 | Citrus Star Inc | Homestead, FL 33030 | $45,499 |
9 | Mcdermid Groves LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34950 | $23,685 |
10 | Hayman Sukram | Miramar, FL 33023 | $10,690 |
11 | Prem Nandial | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $8,140 |
12 | Daniel W Brolmann | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $4,730 |
13 | White City Grove Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $3,306 |
14 | Cassens Land Enterprises LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $2,847 |
15 | C & C Family Grove LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $2,609 |
16 | Stephen Mahlschnee Sr | Fort Pierce, FL 34981 | $2,200 |
17 | Jasmatie Jailall | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $1,888 |
18 | Mr Shion King | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $1,320 |
19 | B & T Cattle LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34982 | $550 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”