Peanut Quota Buyout Program in Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 24,638
Recipients of Peanut Quota Buyout Program from farms in Georgia totaled $533,330,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Peanut Quota Buyout Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | John Hancock Life Insurance Co In | Savoy, IL 61874 | $2,124,760 |
2 | Glenn Heard | Brinson, GA 39825 | $1,869,935 |
3 | Jimmie Ann Ward | Ashburn, GA 31714 | $1,472,225 |
4 | Regions Bank | Huntsville, AL 35804 | $1,236,580 |
5 | Jerry Heard Sr | Newton, GA 39870 | $1,182,940 |
6 | Goose Pond Ag Inc | Savoy, IL 61874 | $1,061,490 |
7 | L & W Farms L P | Brinson, GA 39825 | $1,033,640 |
8 | W Hamill Mcnair | Camilla, GA 31730 | $1,029,595 |
9 | W C Bradley Company | Columbus, GA 31902 | $1,019,460 |
10 | Henry H Griffin | Leesburg, GA 31763 | $996,235 |
11 | Viola Buford Family Limited Partnership | Cordele, GA 31010 | $982,875 |
12 | John W Dawson Est | Hawkinsville, GA 31036 | $977,615 |
13 | Dorminy Brothers Land & Cattle Co | Fitzgerald, GA 31750 | $957,275 |
14 | R G Heard Farms Inc | Brinson, GA 39825 | $917,890 |
15 | Kolomoki Farm LLC | Bluffton, GA 39824 | $904,890 |
16 | Seldom Rest Inc | Donalsonville, GA 31745 | $896,765 |
17 | R G Heard | Brinson, GA 31725 | $895,800 |
18 | M M Shivers | Fort Gaines, GA 39851 | $894,455 |
19 | Charmar Inc | Albany, GA 31707 | $826,675 |
20 | Circle C Farms Inc | Brinson, GA 39825 | $824,510 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>