Farm Subsidy information
Clinch County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Clinch County, Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 342
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clinch County, Georgia totaled $60,092,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $240,972 |
42 | A & M Queens | Homerville, GA 31634 | $240,405 |
43 | Buck Halman Ganas | Homerville, GA 31634 | $236,638 |
44 | Kight's Honey Bee Farm LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $233,371 |
45 | Courson Farms LLC | Lake Park, GA 31636 | $219,961 |
46 | Fortner Berry Farm LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $215,005 |
47 | Lee Engineering Inc Dba Lee Farms | Dupont, GA 31630 | $207,497 |
48 | Dewey Lamar Lankford | Homerville, GA 31634 | $203,932 |
49 | Charles E Handley | Fargo, GA 31631 | $202,582 |
50 | Palmetto Ridge Berries LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $202,173 |
51 | Heather T Bell | Homerville, GA 31634 | $198,316 |
52 | John Lanier Griffis III | Fargo, GA 31631 | $186,819 |
53 | Jamie Mikell Hendricks | Homerville, GA 31634 | $181,295 |
54 | Suwannee Creek Berries LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $180,609 |
55 | C & T Blueberries LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $180,257 |
56 | David Britt Doran | Homerville, GA 31634 | $179,444 |
57 | , | $177,305 | |
58 | Berry Patch Honey LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $176,674 |
59 | Randy Rewis | Homerville, GA 31634 | $171,907 |
60 | Tiner Farms LLC | Du Pont, GA 31630 | $170,054 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”