Farm Subsidy information
Clinch County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Clinch County, Georgia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 78
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clinch County, Georgia totaled $5,173,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Cox Blueberry Farm Inc | Homerville, GA 31634 | $15,084 |
42 | Kathy W Handley | Fargo, GA 31631 | $14,512 |
43 | Dustin Philpot | Homerville, GA 31634 | $14,033 |
44 | John Alex James | Homerville, GA 31634 | $13,310 |
45 | Midway Berries LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $12,992 |
46 | Lutz Berry Farm LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $12,783 |
47 | Brian Lee | Du Pont, GA 31630 | $12,459 |
48 | Don E Daniel | Homerville, GA 31634 | $12,168 |
49 | Seth Strickland | Homerville, GA 31634 | $12,061 |
50 | James Timothy Wilson | Pearson, GA 31642 | $11,561 |
51 | Eric Steven Thomas | Homerville, GA 31634 | $11,393 |
52 | Heather T Bell | Homerville, GA 31634 | $11,355 |
53 | Palmetto Ridge Berries LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $10,727 |
54 | Hewitt Wesley James | Homerville, GA 31634 | $10,196 |
55 | David Chandler Riberon | Naylor, GA 31641 | $9,893 |
56 | Norris Chester Mattox Jr | Homerville, GA 31634 | $9,162 |
57 | Bradford Neil Register | Homerville, GA 31634 | $8,577 |
58 | Johnson Honey Company LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $8,236 |
59 | Suwannee Creek Berries LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $7,395 |
60 | Surveyor Creek Berries And Bees | Homerville, GA 31634 | $7,112 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”