Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Crawford County, Georgia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 24
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Crawford County, Georgia totaled $777,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pearson Farm | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $331,843 |
2 | William L Barbour | Byron, GA 31008 | $78,374 |
3 | B&t Martin Farms LLC | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $57,406 |
4 | Dennis James | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $47,070 |
5 | Zenithland Farm LLC | Roberta, GA 31078 | $44,494 |
6 | Jane Shaw | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $39,261 |
7 | Alfred L Pearson Jr | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $37,318 |
8 | John L Shaw | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $31,709 |
9 | Shanon Rhett Barbour | Byron, GA 31008 | $25,514 |
10 | Lee Farms LLC | Hoschton, GA 30548 | $21,392 |
11 | Robert F Ray Estate | Perry, GA 31069 | $20,281 |
12 | Cleveland Tree Company Inc | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $8,979 |
13 | Charles S Hayes Jr | Byron, GA 31008 | $8,539 |
14 | Cleveland Organics LLC | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $8,030 |
15 | Wynelle T Hanner | Byron, GA 31008 | $4,175 |
16 | David H Cleveland | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $4,059 |
17 | Jared Fluellen | Perry, GA 31069 | $2,560 |
18 | Edgar Parent | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $2,110 |
19 | A Lawton Pearson III | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $2,024 |
20 | Thomas Redding Cleveland | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $802 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>